Update on Hesperocallis undulata Study

 I have been studying desert lilies (Hesperocallis undulata) for a few years. I started in 2017 when we had enough rain to produce a bumper crop of lilies. At the end of that season I collected several fruit which contained a few hundred seeds. I planted some of these seeds in the ground in Borrego Springs and a few others in a container that I took home to Encinitas. In the winter of 2017-18 a number of the seeds germinated and produced their first hair-like leaves.

The ones in the container in Encinitas did better than the ones in the ground in Borrego, most likely due to receiving a little more rain and some supplemental water from me, as well as cooler summertime temperatures. The container now has three individual plants in it. My goal was not just to grow them but to observe the bulbs after a few years of growth. This year felt like the right year to do so. I waited until the leaves had dried, indicating that the plant was finished for this season. The following photo shows the container with three leaves emerging from the sandy soil.

Today I dumped the soil out of the container and broke it up to find the bulbs, such as they might be. The following photo shows the baby bulbs after three full seasons of growth.

I cut the leaves off at ground level and finished removing the bulbs from the soils so they could be measured and weighed as shown in the next series of photos.

All three bulbs were approximately three inches below the soil surface. The bulb immediately above has the most intact root system, reaching more than 3 inches below the base of the bulb. Next I weighed them. The weight of each is shown in grams below. Clearly these are small bulbs, still immature but having the characteristic bulb structure.

One of the things I have been curious about is how geophytes reach their optimal depth in the soil after germinating on the surface of the soil. These particular bulbs germinated on the surface of the soil 2018. Between then and now, they have descended 3 inches as the bulbs have grown in size. By what mechanism does this occur?

One possibility that I have considered is some kind of contractile root. I examined the roots of these bulbs to see if anything like a contractile root can be found. Two of the bulbs have very fine roots that could not possibly be contractile. However, the bulb weighing 0.34 grams has a thicker root than the others. This bulb also has a more typical root adjacent to the thickened one. Below is a closeup photo of those roots.

Although it isn't a clear-cut case, this thickened root appears to have some ridges or rings similar to a true contractile root. It is interesting that this bulb is also the largest by weight, but what this means is unclear. Why this thickened root is not present on the other bulbs is also not clear to me. It could be that the other bulbs had such a structure but it was detached when I removed it from the soil. I didn't see anything like this, but it is still a possibility. Another possibility is that the other two bulbs lost their thickened root earlier, while the larger bulb retained it longer. A third possibility is that the other two bulbs never had such a root, but that raises the question how they came to the same depth in the soil as the larger bulb. These are questions that will have to wait for an answer.

In addition to these bulbs that were produced from seed, I have one bulb that I collected when it was already more-or-less full size. I put it in a container and brought it to Encinitas to see how well it would do in a mild, coastal environment. It did quite well, even flowering one year. This year it didn't receive enough rain to leaf-out, and I didn't give it enough supplemental water. I decided to remove this bulb from the soil to see what its condition might be. 

There isn't much to be learned from this bulb because it has no visible roots, I don't have a previous weight for it, and I was unable to get an accurate measurement of its depth. However, this weight is one data point that I can use as a baseline for measurements in future years.

A Garden in Five Parts - Shade Section

 

A Garden in Five Parts - Pond Section

A Garden in Five Parts - Channel Islands Section

 

A Garden in Five Parts - Oak Woodland/Chaparral Section

 

On the left is oak leaf mulch. On the right is island ironwood mulch

Top row - Clarkia unguiculata, Geranium sp., Layia platyglossa, Epilobium canum. 

Bottom row- Mirabilis laevis crassifolia, Sisyrinchium bellum, Nempophila menziesii, Lupinus succulentus

Left photo - Dudleya lanceolata and Bloomeria crocea. Right photo - various Dudleya species

Brodiaea filifolia, Dipterostemon capitatum, Bloomeria crocea, Allium haematochiton

A Garden in Five Parts - Baja Section

 On April 22 I gave a Zoom talk for the San Diego chapter of the California Native Plant Society. The topic was my garden and its five different sections. Since I haven't blogged since December, I'm going to post all of my slides from the Zoom presentation. First comes the Baja section. I'll post the rest tomorrow. The slides will generally speak for themselves but I will add a few notes where it might be helpful. 

Note: if you plant Shaw's Agave, watch out for the spines. They are lethal. Also, the juice inside the leaves will burn your skin, so use caution when trimming it.